Steny Hoyer: why shouldn’t DC force pro-life Christians to hire pro-aborts?

Source: Live Action

    

Just in case you were still under the impression that “pro-choice” has anything to do with letting people make choices (despite all evidence to the contrary), House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer is here to clear things up.

CNS News recently grilled the leading congressional Democrat on the District of Columbia’s Reproductive Health Non-Discrimination Act, which forbids DC employers from “discriminat[ing] against an individual with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment” on the basis of their “reproductive health decision making, including a decision to use or access a particular drug, device or medical service, because of or on the basis of an employer’s personal beliefs about such services.”

Translation: if you’re an organization in the nation’s capital with any pro-life sensibilities—even if your whole purpose for existing is stopping abortion—you can’t expect your employees to actually agree with your mission statement. If someone working for you spends their every waking moment off the clock working against your cause, apparently you can do nothing but smile and nod at him for eight hours a day. (Something tells me this isn’t a courtesy Planned Parenthood would extend to pro-lifers.)

Noticing that this is, well, insane, and mindful that the Constitution gives Congress jurisdiction over DC affairs, CNS News asked Hoyer, “Can the government force religious organizations to hire people who advocate for abortion?”

First he claimed he couldn’t comment on a law he wasn’t familiar with, but at least gave lip service to liberty:

Well, look, I don’t know specifically what you’re referring to. We’ve been through this with the ACA [Affordable Care Act]. I believe that clearly the ability of people to speak freely is a constitutional guarantee, but I also think freedom of religion is a constitutional guarantee and they need to be balanced, and that’s always a tough thing to do. I’ll leave it at that.

But, lest any of the Abortion Party’s leaders accidentally leave people thinking they might be reasonable, his office soon followed up with a statement that Mr. Hoyer would be letting this blatantly unconstitutional infringement on conscience rights slide after all, thank you very much:

Mr. Hoyer supports D.C. autonomy and home rule, and consistent with that support, he defers to the City Council and Mayor in enacting legislation.

Ah, I see. So in his view, Uncle Sam shouldn’t meddle in local decision-making. Got it. But what happens when the locality in question isn’t run by pro-aborts and doesn’t have the third-highest abortion rate in the country? Then you get the Freedom of Choice Act of 1993, which would have expressly forbidden states from banning abortion, legislatively codifying Roe v. Wade. And look who was one of the cosponsors: Steny Hoyer!

Hoyer’s been in office for almost twenty years, and Planned Parenthood and NARAL have rated him 100% in nearly all of them. He cheers Roe v. Wade for “affirm[ing] every woman’s basic right to individual privacy and reproductive health choices.”

Presumably he would explain all this away by arguing abortion is special because it’s a constitutional right. Even setting aside the fact that it absolutely isn’t, that still begs the question: and pro-life employers’ rights to religion, conscience, and association aren’t?

Legally, Hoyer’s got home rule exactly backwards: he believes in the autonomy of a locality the Constitution expressly says is notautonomous, but stands unapologetically for Congress and the Supreme Court taking such choices away from the governments which do have such lawful discretion. It’s almost as if “choice” is only a pretext for another value he’s really concerned about…

2/20/2015

See also
Teach Your Children Well Teach Your Children Well
Fr. Lawrence Farley
Teach Your Children Well Teach Your Children Well
Fr. Lawrence Farley
The times have become even more dangerous for children as we descend further and further into spiritual barbarism and as every last trace of Christian faith and morals is banned and banished from our western culture.
Sex and the Moral Imagination Sex and the Moral Imagination
Fr. Stephen Freeman
Sex and the Moral Imagination Sex and the Moral Imagination
Fr. Stephen Freeman
As the day draws near for the US Supreme Court to insist on nationwide approval for gay marriage, a watershed in modern thought has been reached. For although the Supreme Court is not the arbiter of morality, its decisions generally signal a deep level of cultural acceptance.
The Moral Path of Being The Moral Path of Being
Fr. Stephen Freeman
The Moral Path of Being The Moral Path of Being
Fr. Stephen Freeman
If Christian morality is not a legal or forensic matter, how are we to think about moral behavior? Does the word have no use for Orthodox Christians? What do we think about when we confess our sins?
Patriarch Kirill: “Any crisis is based on people’s lack of moral well-being” Patriarch Kirill: “Any crisis is based on people’s lack of moral well-being” Patriarch Kirill: “Any crisis is based on people’s lack of moral well-being” Patriarch Kirill: “Any crisis is based on people’s lack of moral well-being”
Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia in his Christmas interview with the Russia-1 state-owned Russian TV channel said that any crisis in a society is a result of the people’s and society’s lack of moral well-being.
Dozens of Congressmen speak out against Roe v. Wade as 41st anniversary nears Dozens of Congressmen speak out against Roe v. Wade as 41st anniversary nears Dozens of Congressmen speak out against Roe v. Wade as 41st anniversary nears Dozens of Congressmen speak out against Roe v. Wade as 41st anniversary nears
Nearly two dozen pro-life lawmakers took to the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives to condemn the Supreme Court’s controversial decision in Roe v. Wade Wednesday, just one week before the 41st anniversary of the infamous ruling, which legalized abortion throughout America.
Leave the side of evil Leave the side of evil
Sergei Khudiev
Leave the side of evil Leave the side of evil
Sergei Khudiev
Contrary to what the advocates of abortions usually say, there is nothing specifically religious in recognizing abortion to be murder. "You must not deprive an innocent human being of life" is an evident moral truth known to people even outside of Biblical revelation.
Comments
Here you can leave your comment on the present article, not exceeding 4000 characters. All comments will be read by the editors of OrthoChristian.Com.
Enter through FaceBook
Your name:
Your e-mail:
Enter the digits, seen on picture:

Characters remaining: 4000

Subscribe
to our mailing list

* indicates required
×