Yes, that's correct: I did love you. I loved you since my early childhood.
Somehow an image was formed in my mind of a dispassionate, handsome
British hero, narrow face with Roman-shaped profile, who fears nothing and
no one, traversing oceans and continents, at home in any spot of the globe.
During my school years this charming image not only did not fade, but
shined with new attractive colors: endurance (Livingston), inventor's savvy
(Stephenson), scholastic achievement (Newton, Faraday, Maxwell), and --
most delightful for that age -- that unquenchable inquisitiveness which
makes men embark on long journeys and discover new lands (Captain Cook,
Admiral Drake). Full half of the world map on the wall in the little home
of my childhood near Moscow was painted green: quite an excitement for a
young heart. British Empire ruled all over the globe -- high seas, diamonds
of Golconda, pearls of Bengal, ivory of Black Africa, Australia where the
sun goes the other way and at night high above in the sky shines the
Southern Cross which none of us has ever seen.
Then came the War, and Britain became our ally. Airways brought to us
"It's a long long way to Tipperary" and other songs from the wartime
British movies in Russian translation: soon they felt 100% Russian. Then I
learned from an eyewitness account that Londoners' behavior during air
raids was impeccable: no cases of panic whatsoever, fires put out
effectively and quickly, -- and that added yet more to my respect for the
Englishmen. Later, in college, I was fascinated by Kipling (whom I still
view as the greatest foreign poet of the XX century) and realized that
native's deference to sahib is not a matter of servility: it is a
full-hearted acknowledgment of the greatness of the British spirit.
The "Mary Gloster" infatuated me immensely, with the inner strength,
resolve, will power and courage of its hero. It was he, however, who cast
the first shadow over my home-made British ideal: I doubted whether he was
the right role-model. Sure, he had the same kind of strength as all my
favorite Britons, but to what end did he use it? To material wealth,
that's it. What a contrast with David Livingston who was equally steadfast
in pursuit of his goal: rather than searching for the mysteries of the Dark
Continent, Sir Anthony Gloster sacrificed his beloved wife, his children
and himself to a profitable business, only to pass it over to his spoiled
son who couldn't care less for it. Gloster understands that his efforts
were in vain, but, in his view, his error was simply in having raised his
son differently form his own upbringing:
"Harrer an' Trinity College! I ought to ha' sent you to sea --
But I stood you an education, an' what have you done for me?"
But what would be different if the wealthy heir were placed in
circumstances similar to those of his father's formative years and
developed qualities of a seaman rather than of a pet puppy? In any case he
would have inherited the company, not the helm. Would he then be more
courageous in financial deals or stock market raids? Would he then
increase his net worth?... How dull and petty it was, how unworthy of the
lofty standard I saw in a Briton! At that time I could not see the reality
behind that kind of rot: I discounted it as Sir Anthony's personal failing,
an exception, and worried no more.
* * *
Many-many years later I got a chance to visit Britain and meet the Britons
both in the capital and in the country. I can tell you right away that I
liked them: I have found courageous, straight, self-sufficient, well
organized and intelligent people with great sense of humor, love and care
for their land and beautiful English language -- music compared to American
English, at least for my ear. I made friends who later came to see me in
Moscow and loved it. But I have also found cases of rot which I could not
brush away as something superficial or incidental: that was the reality of
the British life late in the XX century.
I remember being upset twice: right upon entering the country, and right
before leaving. When we arrived to Dover on the ferry from Ostende we were
about to take train to London, but the railroad was on strike and we took a
bus. Anxiously I was watching road signs, not to miss the town line of the
famed British capital. Here we are, on a London street! Houses on both
sides, people on the sidewalks... But why are they black? Haven't we
missed London by chance? Isn't it rather Nairobi, or maybe Lagos? No,
this is London, the East Side, populated mostly by the Blacks: had we come
here by train, we would not have seen it at all.
I hope you won't mistake me for a racist: I have no prejudice whatsoever
against the Black people. But what is the reason for them to be here, in
London, rather than at home, in Africa? Let every flower blossom, each
kind in its place: if they are all mixed with no concern for their species,
they will surely choke one another... After all, it is not African tribes
I have come here to meet.
My excitement was all but gone. Same night, however, I left London for
South Wales, where for a few weeks I was in a company of Celts and
Anglo-Saxons. Then I stayed in Chiswick, a London borough, and still felt
like I am in Britain, but other parts of that great city looked more like
Africa.
On the day of my departure from England I was sitting in the railway
station, now and again glancing at the clock, waiting for the boarding to
begin. A young man next to me caught my attention: the longer I watched
him, the warmer and brighter I felt. Not only was he exquisitely handsome;
his blue eyes, blond hair, tall stature, fair shape, elegant posture,
comely bearing -- everything about him beamed the radiance of nobility,
that unmistakable pedigree which can be neither faked nor staged, but only
handed down by generations of noble ancestors, gallant gentlemen-warriors
and dainty beautiful ladies.
This rose of a man must have been carefully bred for centuries: in no wise
could it have sprung forth from a wild flower. And now the rose was
willing to open up to a thorn, harsh, crass and unwilling to listen. The
thorn was an ugly arrogant fellow sitting next to him, apparently a Muslim
from South Asia, invariably responding to his amiable overtures with a
brusque, angry "Shuddup" -- as if waving aside a mosquito. Yes, the young
man was certainly on the wrong track, he was under influence of alcohol,
but that only increased the compassion towards him, towards his wasted
beauty and nobility. In his meek attempts to communicate with the ugly guy
he took no offense and kept trying to speak up his soul, very gently and
friendly; to my astonishment he once even said "I have respect to you",
attesting to the worldwide acceptance of this familiar skid row motto...
Watching them was painful. "One of his ancestors, -- thought I -- maybe
fought at Poitiers side by side with Edward the Black Prince, shaping the
future of the world, and he is prostrate before an arrogant foreigner...
Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth, says the Gospel;
not the meek but the shameless from lands far away are inheriting the fair
city on the British Isles, having all but taken possession of it.
* * *
My London impressions, arguably little things by themselves, gained great
and sinister symbolic significance in the grim days of the Serbian War of
1999. As the world was watching with shame and disgust Britain's overtures
to Albanian Muslim terrorists and her fervor in destruction of Serbia from
a safe distance, the scene at the Victoria station replayed itself again
and again before my eyes. Now the entire nation laid prostrate before a
bunch of bloody scoundrels d.b.a. "Muslim Freedom Fighters" and bent over
backwards to demonstrate how deeply they are respected. But, just like
then, Britons got no respect in return: having taken over the land of
Kosovo, Albanian warlords unleashed genocide against the remaining
Christians, safely ignoring British "peacekeepers". Could it have been
otherwise with that sort of people who know no other way of interaction
between men than armed terror and slavish submission?
I did love you, Britons. As you have seen, my love might not be altogether
dead, but it is surely dying, in fact giving way to scorn. Should that
surprise you? Having once proclaimed that "Britons never will be slaves",
haven't you submitted yourself to willful slavery, first to the Americans,
and now to the Muslims? Haven't you delivered your once magnificent
capital to invaders from your former colonies and let Muslim terrorists
openly run their business from their London headquarters, with no concern
for your police which is in turn busy beating up those of you who dare to
protest the invasion? Haven't you completely lost the sense of shame? I
agree that love is blind, but not entirely blind, and you subjected my love
to excessively severe trials. You have not merely lost your national
dignity: you have trampled on it, gleefully stoking tabloid scandals over
the last monument to your national honor -- your Royal family.
Such is my sad love story. Treason kills love, and my beloved Britons
turned traitors. They have betrayed not me, of course, -- who am I, after
all? -- but their own land, and I will not forgive that.
Why did it happen? Let us think about it together.
"...The things I knew was proper you wouldn't thank me to give,
And the things I knew was rotten you said was the way to live".
Victor N. Trostnikov (Authorized Translation from Russian)
|